More image models
Alternative models that can be useful in specific situations where cost-effectiveness and specialized capabilities matter more than cutting-edge features.
Last updated
Alternative models that can be useful in specific situations where cost-effectiveness and specialized capabilities matter more than cutting-edge features.
A great image generation model developed by Black Forest Labs in collaboration with Krea AI. Best for photorealistic images that avoid the oversaturated "AI look."
Strengths for marketers:
Exceptional photorealism with accurate skin textures and natural lighting.
Distinctive aesthetics that don't immediately look AI-generated.
Lightning-fast generation speeds.
Dynamic camera angles and expressive color handling.
Ideal use cases:
Lifestyle photography and natural product shots.
Ad creatives where avoiding the "AI look" is critical.
Weaknesses:
Complex scene representation is worse than latest state-of-the-art models
May require more specific prompting compared to commercial models.
3 reference images maximum
An image editing model developed by Bytedance.
Strengths for marketers:
Maintains high fidelity in unedited areas
Ideal use cases:
Asset seasonality (e.g., background changes, lighting conversion)
Persona visual adaptations (e.g., portrait editing, perspective changes)
Quick asset edit through selective object removal/modification
Prompt examples
Lighting Changes Prompt: “Change the scene to daytime” Transforms lighting and shadows across the entire scene while preserving all original details.
Object Removal Prompt: “Remove all pedestrians except the middle character” Accurately identifies and removes specified objects including their shadows.
Style Conversion Prompt: “Make the girl look realistic” Converts 2D illustrations to photorealistic images while preserving clothing, accessories, and other details.
An image generation model developed by Google. Best for lifestyle pictures and simple graphic design.
Strengths for marketers:
Decent at graphic design, including layouts and complex text.
Photorealism, but slightly less refined than Google Imagen-4 Ultra.
Prompt adherence: has a more literal interpretation vs. Imagen-4 Ultra.
Ideal use cases:
Simple blog illustrations
Lifestyle photos: build your custom stock image
Weaknesses:
No image references ⇒ rarely brand consistent + cannot be used for product use cases.
Struggles with complex prompts requiring complex spatial relationships.
Last updated